Post

A governance checklist for moving AI from pilot to production

The questions leaders should answer before an AI-enabled workflow is trusted with live organisational work.

A pilot proves that a capability can work in selected conditions. Production readiness asks whether people can trust, operate, support, and improve it under real conditions.

Purpose and ownership

  • Is the business outcome and approved scope documented?
  • Who owns the process, the technical service, and the risk decision?
  • Who can pause or disable the workflow?

Data and knowledge

  • Which sources may the solution access?
  • Is the information current, authorised, and appropriately retained?
  • Can an output link back to evidence where decisions require traceability?

Permissions and actions

  • Which tools and records can the solution read or change?
  • Are permissions limited to what the use case requires?
  • Which actions require human approval?

Quality and evaluation

  • Has the system been tested against normal, difficult, ambiguous, and adversarial cases?
  • Are quality thresholds and escalation conditions defined?
  • Can failures and inappropriate outputs be identified after launch?

Operations and recovery

  • Are executions, errors, changes, and costs observable?
  • Is there a safe fallback when a model, connection, or data source is unavailable?
  • Do support teams have documentation and a recovery procedure?

People and change

  • Do users understand what the system does, what it does not do, and when they remain accountable?
  • Is feedback captured and reviewed?
  • Are process measures reviewed alongside technical measures?

Governance should be proportional to the impact of the use case. The goal is not paperwork; it is clear authority and evidence that allow useful AI to scale responsibly.